Tuesday, March 11, 2008




















You have been sent to this blog because you are a member of the media, Victorian Police or Victorian Public servant that deals with wildlife.
You might be also unaware of the antics of one of Australia`s most prolific internet stalkers.
He uses the name "michael moss" when in court facing different charges but some of his many aliases are Alec Turner of Leongatha, Peter Anderson, Paul Anderson,Paul Adams,Peter Chapple and Peter Thompson of Sunderland Bay.
Why would a normal person resort to multiple aliases.?
They wouldnt.!!
He has an interest in unusual animal reports like "panthers" and "thylacines" and, since he is unemployed and obviously mentally ill, has a large amount of time on his malicious little hands.
He has been stalking people on the internet using chat boards and emails and by public phones for the last 10 years.
And the crime of those he hates and stalks....they have dared express an interest in the same unusual animal reports and dare to get mentioned in the media.
And because some of them work with scientists and have been collecting evidence, neither of which he has ever done..he hates them.
Would a normal person react like that.?
Always by hiding in public libraries or museums or using public telephones.
Big brave "Michael Moss", or whatever name he is using today, claims several things.
1/That he has a data base of over 150 sightings of "panthers".
False.No one has ever seen this.
2/That he has provided evidence that there are "panthers" in Victoria.
False.No one has ever seen this.He confuses a $20.oo FOI on the work of public servants or on the work of other researchers as cutting edge "research".
3/That he works with scientists.
False.No scientists have ever worked with him or would.
4/That he once filmed a thylacine.
False.
Then why does he give the footage away for free.?
Which makes no sense if it was the world rarest animal.
But makes complete sense if it was just a fox with mange..which is all it was.
Or ask Nick Mooney.

Local wildlife biologist and thylacine guru Nick Mooney had heard the theory before and said it didn't wash."There is no evidence whatsoever beyond a vague conspiracy. There were some animals released at Wilsons Promontory but tigers were not on the list," he said. He and other independent experts have examined Mr Moss's footage and believe it to be a mangy fox carrying a rabbit.

http://www.news.com.au/mercury/story/0,22884,23186559-921,00.html


He is mainly resident in State Library of Victoria where he writes his puerile and hate filled prose.
Lets have a look at some of (we censored them)examples of some of his finest writing.
They are from
inetnum: 203.17.215.0 - 203.17.215.255
netname: STATELIBVIC-AU
descr: State Library of Victoria
descr: 328 Swanston St.
descr: MELBOURNE
descr: VIC 3000
country: AU
The Victorian Computer Crime Squad, Victorian Police ,The State Library of Melbourne and Melbourne Museum all have the posts/emails that he has sent and are aware of his activities.
Ask them.?

1/Fraud ###### and his whore ##### are at it again.He has posted on his second rate and unread big cat site an article from the #### newspaper providing quotes attributed to him when he has never appeared in the original article.Copies of the### article and the fraud on his website have been taken and will be provided to any media ###### the fraud and his whore ###### appear on!

2/Did you know #### aka ### worked as a prostitute in sydney for many years?

3/Go to google enter ###### press cached and scroll down to last article to see the fraud ,dogshit ####### has tried to cover it up by closing his website but press cached to see the fraud,the real ### newspaper article is completely different from the online one dogshit ##### was not involved in the original at all that featured in the ##### newspaper.He should stick to being fucked up his arse by ##### of ##### hunters

4/The rumors about ####### being a prostitute are also interestingly backed up by fact have a chat to ########## her regular client.

5/I would just like the say sorry for posting as norman bates i have just been released from a mental institution and my girlfriend ##### is working as a prostitute in sydney paying off the debt i owe to the mental facility.

6/michael moss big cat reaearcher is australias leading big cat researcher he has uncovered through his freedom of information requests big cat sightings all over mainland australia and has over the past 12 years been the person who has put the mainland big cats on the publics mind and scientists radar.HE also exposed a couple of years ago a fraud in gippsland victoria about a feral cat that was tried to be tricked up to be a big cat- panther.
Status: Shown
ip: 136.154.202.1

7/YES ###### and ########## are ######## they have to link their profile to michael moss on this website because thay have no credibility of their own,in fact ####### his partner works as a sydney prostitute .
Status: Shown
ip: 136.154.202.1

8/I am sorry of my past as a prostitute but i am now learning to try and survive without exchanging sex for money.I am still a prostitute.
Status: Shown
ip: 79.68.102.179

9/YES ####### is also a thief years ago he stole ####### plaster casts of yowie.HE lives in shame .Thief!
Status: Shown
ip: 203.3.70.8

Crimes Act 1958 - SECT 21A

Stalking

21A. Stalking





(1) A person must not stalk another person.Penalty: Level 5 imprisonment
(10 years maximum).

(2) A person (the offender) stalks another person (the victim)
if the offenderengages in a course of conduct which includes any
of the following-
(a) following the victim or any other person;

(b) contacting the victim or any other person by post, telephone, fax,
text message, e-mail or other electronic communication or by any other
means whatsoever;

(ba) publishing on the Internet or by an e-mail or other electronic
communication to any person a statement or other material-

(i) relating to the victim or any other person; or

(ii) purporting to relate to, or to originate from, the victim or any other
person;

(bb) causing an unauthorised computer function (within the meaning of
Subdivision (6) of Division 3) in a computer owned or used by the
victim or any other person;

(bc) tracing the victim's or any other person's use of the Internet or of
e-mail or other electronic communications;

(c) entering or loitering outside or near the victim's or any other
person's place of residence or of business or any other place
frequented by the victim or the other person;

(d) interfering with property in the victim's or any other person's
possession (whether or not the offender has an interest in the
property);

(e) giving offensive material to the victim or any other person or leaving
it where it will be found by, given to or brought to the attention of,
the victim or the other person;

(f) keeping the victim or any other person under surveillance;

(g) acting in any other way that could reasonably be expected to arouse
apprehension or fear in the victim for his or her own safety or that
of any other person-

with the intention of causing physical or mental harm to the victim or of
arousing apprehension or fear in the victim for his or her own safety or that
of any other person.

(3) For the purposes of this section an offender also has the intention to
cause physical or mental harm to the victim or to arouse apprehension or fear
in the victim for his or her own safety or that of any other person if-

(a) the offender knows that engaging in a course of conduct of that kind
would be likely to cause such harm or arouse such apprehension or
fear; or

(b) the offender in all the particular circumstances ought to have
understood that engaging in a course of conduct of that kind would be
likely to cause such harm or arouse such apprehension or fear and it
actually did have that result.

(4) This section does not apply to conduct engaged in by a person performing
official duties for the purpose of-

(a) the enforcement of the criminal law; or

(b) the administration of any Act; or

(c) the enforcement of a law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or

(d) the execution of a warrant; or



(e) the protection of the public revenue-

that, but for this subsection, would constitute an offence against subsection
(1).

(4A) In a proceeding for an offence against subsection (1) it is a defence to
the charge for the accused to prove that the course of conduct was engaged in
without malice-

(a) in the normal course of a lawful business, trade, profession or
enterprise (including that of any body or person whose business, or
whose principal business, is the publication, or arranging for the
publication, of news or current affairs material); or

(b) for the purpose of an industrial dispute; or

(c) for the purpose of engaging in political activities or discussion or
communicating with respect to public affairs.

(5) Despite anything to the contrary in the Crimes (Family Violence) Act 1987,
the Court within the meaning of that Act may make an intervention order under
that Act in respect of a person (the defendant) if satisfied on the balance of
probabilities that the defendant has stalked another person and is likely to
continue to do so or to do so again and for this purpose that Act has effect
as if the other person were a family member in relation to the defendant
within the meaning of that Act if he or she would not otherwise be so.

(6) It is immaterial that some or all of the course of conduct constituting an
offence against subsection (1) occurred outside Victoria, so long as the
victim was in Victoria at the time at which that conduct occurred.

(7) It is immaterial that the victim was outside Victoria at the time at which
some or all of the course of conduct constituting an offence against
subsection (1) occurred, so long as that conduct occurred in Victoria.